The Cost of Junk Science is significant

Stan Young saw and sent me this article by Freedman in PLOS Biology on the consequences of unreproducible (bad) biological research.

Stan’s note (Stan is a PhD in Stats and Genetics): 183 more words


What's the surprise that ABC was all wrong on its 2009 climate catastrophe predictions

The important thing to consider in a world of leftist bullshitters, is they don’t really care if they are right or wrong, truthful or not–they are posing as concerned and superior, so evidence and truth is not important. 33 more words

Climate Change

Psychology resaerch is junky? Big surprise to you?

The reason that social science studies are so junky is obvious–they are often loaded up with political agendas, driven by intellectual passion and the beneficiaries of journal editor publication bias and a desire to be covered by the mainstream press. 65 more words

Scientific Method

Norm Rogers discusses the Clean Energy Summit nonsense

I continue to be astounded at the inanities of the lefty enviros, the mystical thinking.

Norm catalogues their craziness. 8 more words


More on EPA misconduct and bad science--an analysis of the junk

John Graham’s well regarded paper on the problems of EPA research is linked below. 503 more words

Climate Change

Thomas LIfson applauds the Milloy expose' of Soros theft of coal

I have been watching the Milloy’s tweets on Soros, and of course coal company stocks are cheap.

The coal industry people are weaklings, don’t know how or what to do in the face of this theft of value. 132 more words

Climate Change